-
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I know there were some comments awhile back about being required
> > to switch to PAM. Has that occurred?
> >
> > If not then there is a regression issue for realtime-lsm.
>
> As Realtime LSM is an out of tree module and there's no stable kernel
> module API it's impossible to prevent regressions.
>
> That being said, the realtime LSM patch is so simple that it should
> work - how exactly does it fail?
i can include it in -rt if it's simple enough - if someone's interested
then please send me a patch.
Ingo