Re: [PATCH 1/2 -mm] fault-injection: safer defaults, trivialoptimization, cleanup

[Don Mullis]

On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:37 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

> We'd prefer one-patch-per-concept, please. This all sounds like about
> six patches.

Understood.

> We _could_ merge this patch as-is, but it means that when this stuff
> finally hits mainline it would go in as a nice sequence of logical patches,
> followed by a random thing which is splattered all over all the preceding
> patches.

Does this argue for a respin of the original patches, folding in
content from this one, rather than splitting it into an additional six to
be appended to the series?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/