Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an archdoesn't support it

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Fri Dec 08 2006 - 14:39:10 EST




On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:
>
> I utterly disagree. I could code atomic_add() as:

Sure. And Alpha could do that too. If you write the C code a specific way,
you can make it work. That does NOT mean that you can expose it widely as
a portable interface - it's still just a very _nonportable_ interface that
you use internally within one architecture to implement other interfaces.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/