Re: [PATCH 0/33] KVM: MMU: Cache shadow page tables

[Avi Kivity]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Is this intended for 2.6.20, or would you prefer that we release what we
> have now and hold this off for 2.6.21?
>   

Even though these patches are potentially destabilazing, I'd like them 
(and a few other patches) to go into 2.6.20:

- kvm did not exist in 2.6.19, hence we cannot regress from that
- this patchset is the difference between a working proof of concept and 
a generally usable system
- from my testing, it's quite stable

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/