Re: [PATCH 0/33] KVM: MMU: Cache shadow page tables

[Ingo Molnar]

* Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >Is this intended for 2.6.20, or would you prefer that we release what we
> >have now and hold this off for 2.6.21?
> >  
> 
> Even though these patches are potentially destabilazing, I'd like them 
> (and a few other patches) to go into 2.6.20:
> 
> - kvm did not exist in 2.6.19, hence we cannot regress from that
> - this patchset is the difference between a working proof of concept and 
> a generally usable system
> - from my testing, it's quite stable

seconded - i have tested the new MMU changes quite extensively and they 
are converging nicely. It brings down context-switch costs by a factor 
of 10 and more, even for microbenchmarks: instead of throwing away the 
full shadow pagetable hiearchy we have worked so hard to construct this 
patchset allows the intelligent caching of shadow pagetables. The effect 
is human-visible as well - the system got visibly snappier.

(I'd increase the shadow cache pool from the current 256 pages to at 
least 1024 pages, but that's a detail.)

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/