Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0

[Alessandro Di Marco]

 Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> writes:

   > For example, the subsystem provides at kernel-level handy
   > hiberante/suspend/resume callbacks that I use to turn on/off the timer,
   > avoiding the time-warp problem. Doing that at user-level would be far more
   > messy...

   Imagine for a moment that we solve time-warp somehow. Any other
   problems? [I'd really like to get "is user idle" solved, but it really
   should not be in kernel unless it _has_ to. And time-warp probably
   causes problems not only for your daemon.]

Hi, 
the two patches in attachment fix the time-warp problem and remove the procfs
support. Feel free to contact me when you'll find a better way, maybe I could
help.

Best,