Re: [ANNOUNCE] System Inactivity Monitor v1.0

[Bodo Eggert]

Scott Preece <sepreece@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> My own hot button is making sure that the definition of what
> constitutes user activity is managed in exactly one place, whether in
> the kernel or not. My naive model would be to put the response at user
> level, but to provide a single point of definition in the kernel (say,
> /dev/useractivity or the equivalent) that the user-level daemon could
> listen to.

Imagine one computer serving two users. Two monitors, two keyboards ...
-- 
Funny quotes:
38. Last night I played a blank tape at full blast. The mime next door went
    nuts.
Friß, Spammer: hEOzVVU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/