RE: Kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:509

From: Ananiev, Leonid I
Date: Thu Feb 01 2007 - 09:00:58 EST

Next message: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] radio modems sitting on serial port are not for s390"
Previous message: Erik Mouw: "Re: Free Linux Driver Development!"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:509"
Next in thread: Ken Chen: "Re: Kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:509"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>> BUG: warning at mm/truncate.c:398/invalidate_inode_pages2_range()
> That warning got removed from -rc7.

2.6.20-rc-7: After 57 minutes and after 25 minutes of aiostress running
I've got 2 system hangs without any message in log.
On the third time I opened the console and got kernel panic massage:

$ ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:507!
invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
CPU 2
Modules linked in: firmware_class
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.20-rc7 #1
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802841a3>] [<ffffffff802841a3>]
__aio_put_req+0x22/0x146
RSP: 0018:ffff810037e4fd70 EFLAGS: 00010086
RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: ffff810037142ec0 RCX: 0000000025934000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff810037142ec0 RDI: ffff810005f8be40
RBP: ffff810005f8be40 R08: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R09: ffff810001000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff802531b0 R12: ffff810005f8bea8
R13: 0000000000004000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000213
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff81000225dec0(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000003cdca945d0 CR3: 0000000039002000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff810037e48000, task
ffff810037e47560)
Stack: ffff810037142ec0 ffff810005f8be40 ffff810005f8bea8
ffffffff80284958
0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff8100381f2c00 ffff8100381f2f24
0000000000000246 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff802912a1
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff80284958>] aio_complete+0x16b/0x1c7
[<ffffffff802912a1>] dio_bio_end_aio+0x9e/0xbe
[<ffffffff803051cd>] __end_that_request_first+0x10e/0x3f7
[<ffffffff80306a8b>] blk_run_queue+0x41/0x72
[<ffffffff803aff9d>] scsi_end_request+0x27/0xc9
[<ffffffff803b0180>] scsi_io_completion+0xf0/0x2c5
[<ffffffff803d0063>] ahd_done+0x52b/0x574
[<ffffffff803d3d1a>] sd_rw_intr+0x182/0x1ad
[<ffffffff8030725d>] blk_done_softirq+0x5c/0x6a
[<ffffffff80234d28>] __do_softirq+0x55/0xc3
[<ffffffff802199d2>] ack_apic_level+0x37/0x4b
[<ffffffff8020a95c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[<ffffffff8020c4bb>] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d
[<ffffffff8020c5bd>] do_IRQ+0xb1/0xd0
[<ffffffff80208ba2>] mwait_idle+0x0/0x46
[<ffffffff80209d51>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa
<EOI> [<ffffffff803b0f9d>] scsi_request_fn+0x0/0x33e
[<ffffffff80208be4>] mwait_idle+0x42/0x46
[<ffffffff80208b3a>] cpu_idle+0x8c/0xaf
[<ffffffff80217380>] start_secondary+0x462/0x471

Code: 0f 0b eb fe 74 07 31 c0 e9 12 01 00 00 4c 8d a6 e0 00 00 00
RIP [<ffffffff802841a3>] __aio_put_req+0x22/0x146
RSP <ffff810037e4fd70>
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!

> Oh. 2.6.19. Did you try 2.6.19.latest?
The latest 2.6.19.2 functions exactly as 2.6.19 does.
I should add that I see on user screen:

...kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP

Leonid
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:16 AM
To: Ananiev, Leonid I
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-aio@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:509

On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:13:51 +0300 "Ananiev, Leonid I"
<leonid.i.ananiev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> While repeatedly running 'aiostress -O -o 2' test I've got in
> /var/log/messages:
>
> BUG: warning at mm/truncate.c:398/invalidate_inode_pages2_range()
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff802573c3>] invalidate_inode_pages2_range+0x236/0x26b
> [<ffffffff802af77b>] ext3_direct_IO+0x16c/0x19e
> [<ffffffff802adc1d>] ext3_get_block+0x0/0xe2
> [<ffffffff802518c0>] generic_file_direct_IO+0xb9/0xcf
> [<ffffffff8025193d>] generic_file_direct_write+0x67/0x10e
> [<ffffffff80252308>] __generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x2d6/0x3fe
> [<ffffffff802082c0>] __switch_to+0x26f/0x27e
> [<ffffffff8047b8e9>] thread_return+0x0/0xd8
> [<ffffffff80252497>] generic_file_aio_write+0x67/0xc7
> [<ffffffff802ab2cc>] ext3_file_write+0x0/0x8f
> [<ffffffff802ab2e2>] ext3_file_write+0x16/0x8f
> [<ffffffff802ab2cc>] ext3_file_write+0x0/0x8f
> [<ffffffff80283f61>] aio_rw_vect_retry+0x72/0x14f
> [<ffffffff80284ad9>] aio_run_iocb+0xe6/0x187
> [<ffffffff802853e2>] io_submit_one+0x296/0x2e3
> [<ffffffff80285979>] sys_io_submit+0x9b/0x108
> [<ffffffff80229b49>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xe
> [<ffffffff8020983e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83

That warning got removed from -rc7. It's harmless, in most cases. We
think.

It's a bit of a worry that aio-on-ext3 is triggering it. That's
unexpected.

> ----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] ---------
> Kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:509
> invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMP
> CPU 1
> Modules linked in: firmware_class
> Pid: 11362, comm: aiostress Not tainted 2.6.19 #1

Oh. 2.6.19. Did you try 2.6.19.latest?

> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802841ea>] [<ffffffff802841ea>]
> __aio_put_req+0x27/0x162
> RSP: 0018:ffff81000c167e88 EFLAGS: 00010096
> RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: ffff8100184f8dc0 RCX: 000000001d44f000
> RDX: 000000000000000d RSI: ffff8100184f8dc0 RDI: ffff81001d44ee80
> RBP: ffff81001d44ee80 R08: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R09: ffff810001000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000046 R12: ffff810037341c80
> R13: ffff81001d44ee80 R14: 0000000000606998 R15: 0000000000000000
> FS: 00002ab979b0ee90(0000) GS:ffff810037e896c0(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00002aea207c3950 CR3: 000000001009c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Process aiostress (pid: 11362, threadinfo ffff81000c166000, task
> ffff81003f49f5a0)
> Stack: ffff8100184f8dc0 ffff81001d44ee80 ffff810037341c80
> ffffffff80284ff6
> ffff8100184f8dc0 ffff8100184f8dc0 0000000000000000 ffffffff80285409
> 0000000000607fb0 ffff81001d44ee80 0000000000606998 0000000000000001
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff80284ff6>] aio_put_req+0x21/0x59
> ffffffff80284ff1: e8 cd f1 ff ff callq
ffffffff802841c3
> <__aio_put_req>
> [<ffffffff80285409>] io_submit_one+0x2bd/0x2e3
> [<ffffffff80285979>] sys_io_submit+0x9b/0x108
> [<ffffffff80229b49>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xe
> [<ffffffff8020983e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
>
>
> Code: 0f 0b 68 76 e6 4a 80 c2 fd 01 85 c0 74 07 31 c0 e9 21 01 00
> RIP [<ffffffff802841ea>] __aio_put_req+0x27/0x162
> RSP <ffff81000c167e88>
> NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU 1
> CPU 1
> Modules linked in: firmware_class
> Pid: 11362, comm: aiostress Not tainted 2.6.19 #1
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8047d3f5>] [<ffffffff8047d3f5>]
> _spin_lock_irq+0x8/0x10
> RSP: 0018:ffff81000c167c10 EFLAGS: 00000086
> RAX: ffff81003e0f0001 RBX: ffff81001d44ee80 RCX: 00002ab979b0ef40
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000246 RDI: ffff81001d44eeb8
> RBP: ffff81001d44ee80 R08: 0000000000000286 R09: 0000000000000018
> R10: 0000000000000286 R11: 0000000000000046 R12: 0000000000000001
> R13: 000000000000000b R14: ffffffff804a5904 R15: 0000000000000000
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff810037e896c0(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00002aea207c3950 CR3: 000000001009c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Process aiostress (pid: 11362, threadinfo ffff81000c166000, task
> ffff81003f49f5a0)
> Stack: ffffffff80284050 0000000000000286 ffffffff802441cc
> 0000000000000018
> ffffffff8047cebe 0000000000000246 ffff81001d44ee80 0000000000000000
> ffffffff80285880 ffff81003e0f12c0 ffff81003e0f12c0 ffff81003f49f5a0
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff80284050>] aio_cancel_all+0x12/0x87
> 0x12: e8 9d 93 1f 00 callq ffffffff8047d3ed
> <_spin_lock_irq>
> [<ffffffff802441cc>] lock_hrtimer_base+0x26/0x4c
> [<ffffffff8047cebe>] __down_read+0x12/0x9a
> [<ffffffff80285880>] exit_aio+0x2e/0x8c
> [<ffffffff8022d904>] mmput+0x19/0x98
> [<ffffffff80232be9>] do_exit+0x1f7/0x825
> [<ffffffff80321799>] vgacon_set_cursor_size+0x36/0xd1
> [<ffffffff8020b228>] kernel_math_error+0x0/0x90
> [<ffffffff8020baf4>] do_invalid_op+0xad/0xb7
> [<ffffffff802841ea>] __aio_put_req+0x27/0x162
> [<ffffffff80252308>] __generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x2d6/0x3fe
> [<ffffffff802082c0>] __switch_to+0x26f/0x27e
> [<ffffffff8047d5fd>] error_exit+0x0/0x84
> [<ffffffff802841ea>] __aio_put_req+0x27/0x162
> [<ffffffff80284ff6>] aio_put_req+0x21/0x59
> [<ffffffff80285409>] io_submit_one+0x2bd/0x2e3
> [<ffffffff80285979>] sys_io_submit+0x9b/0x108
> [<ffffffff80229b49>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xe
> [<ffffffff8020983e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> Code: 83 3f 00 7e f9 eb f2 c3 53 48 89 fb e8 06 7b db ff f0 ff 0b
> <1>Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
>
========================================================================
> =======================
>
> It stable happens after 2-5 aiosterss runs on 2.6.20-rc6 as well as on
> 2.6.19 in 4 processor Xeon.
>
> fs/aio.c:509 line is BUG_ON(req->ki_users < 0);
> It may be an effect of return 1 from invalidate_inode_pages2_range()
one
> second earlier as you can see in log.
> To investigate a root cause of ret=0 in
invalidate_inode_pages2_range()
> I have added printk() calls.
> As a result I can say that
> invalidate_inode_pages2_range() reports BUG: warning at
> mm/truncate.c:398 occurs becouse of
> invalidate_complete_page2() returns 0; it
> returns 0 because of
> try_to_release_page() returns 0; it
> returns 0 because of
> ext3_releasepage() returns 0; it
> returns 0 because of
> journal_try_to_free_buffers() returns 0; it
returns
> 0 because of
> try_to_free_buffers() returns 0; it
> returns 0 because of
> drop_buffers() returns 0; it
> returns 0 because of
> buffer_busy(bh) returns 1; it
> returns 0 because of
> buffer_head count is 1 (bh->b_count==1) as additional printk
> reports.
>
> Leonid
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Schwidefsky: "Re: [PATCH] radio modems sitting on serial port are not for s390"
Previous message: Erik Mouw: "Re: Free Linux Driver Development!"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: Kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:509"
Next in thread: Ken Chen: "Re: Kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:509"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]