Re: [PATCH] SUN3/3X Lance trivial fix

From: Cyrill V. Gorcunov
Date: Tue Feb 06 2007 - 07:55:41 EST


On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
| Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
| >Jiri Slaby napsal(a):
| >>Cyrill V. Gorcunov napsal(a):
| >>>This patch adds checking for allocated DVMA
| >>>memory and granted IRQ line.
| >>>
| >>>Signed-off-by: Cyrill V. Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
| >>>
| >>>---
| >>>
| >>> drivers/net/sun3lance.c | 9 ++++++++-
| >>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
| >>>
| >>>diff --git a/drivers/net/sun3lance.c b/drivers/net/sun3lance.c
| >>>index c62e85d..e4c2c88 100644
| >>>--- a/drivers/net/sun3lance.c
| >>>+++ b/drivers/net/sun3lance.c
| >>>@@ -336,13 +336,20 @@ static int __init lance_probe( struct
| >>>net_device *dev)
| >>>
| >>> /* XXX - leak? */
| >>> MEM = dvma_malloc_align(sizeof(struct lance_memory), 0x10000);
| >>>+ if (MEM == NULL) {
| >>>+ printk(KERN_WARNING "SUN3 Lance couldn't allocate DVMA
| >>>memory\n");
|
| And also iounmap() here...
|
| >>>+ return 0;
| >>>+ }
| >>>
| >>> lp->iobase = (volatile unsigned short *)ioaddr;
| >>> dev->base_addr = (unsigned long)ioaddr; /* informational only */
| >>
| >>But now, if it fails (and you return 0=OK state) these are not assigned
| >
| >Ok, 0 is not OK state, I see it now.
| >
| >>and probably used later.
| >>
| >>>
| >>> REGA(CSR0) = CSR0_STOP;
| >>>
| >>>- request_irq(LANCE_IRQ, lance_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED, "SUN3
| >>>Lance", dev);
| >>>+ if (request_irq(LANCE_IRQ, lance_interrupt, IRQF_DISABLED, "SUN3
| >>>Lance", dev) < 0) {
| >>>+ printk(KERN_WARNING "SUN3 Lance unable to allocate IRQ\n");
| >
| >But in that case, you want to dvma_free() here?
|
| And here.
|
| >>>+ return 0;
| >>>+ }
| >>> dev->irq = (unsigned short)LANCE_IRQ;
|
| regards,
| --
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby
| faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
| e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
| B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E

Thanks a lot,

I'll fix it to get iounmap() used. I don't know is there any reason
to use dvma_free() - it's just a 'return' function. May be for further?
I think you are right - we should use dvma_free() anyway...

Cyrill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/