Re: 2.6.20-git15 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! - timers?

[Thomas Gleixner]

Michal,

On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:38 +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > But you still have those softirq pending messages, right ?
> 
> Yes
> 
> (+ new NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02)

Yike, that's the timer softirq.

Can you add the patch below, maybe it gives us some useful info. Please
enable lockdep (your last config had it already)

Thanks,

	tglx

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 512a4a9..cc705c7 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -165,9 +165,11 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(void)
 		goto end;
 
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	if (unlikely(local_softirq_pending()))
-		printk(KERN_ERR "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending %02x\n",
-		       local_softirq_pending());
+	if (unlikely(local_softirq_pending())) {
+		print_irqtrace_events(current);
+		printk(KERN_ERR "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending %02x, %08x\n",
+		       local_softirq_pending(), preempt_count());
+	}
 
 	now = ktime_get();
 	/*


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/