Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks

[Chris Wright]

* Serge E. Hallyn (serue@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> It's unfortunate, agreed, but
> use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a no-go.
> 
> Options?

There's too much dup because stuff like above is just access control
not integrity measurement.  Need to break off the parts that really
are different.  But I don't have a great option offhand, I recognize
the complication.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/