Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks
From: Casey Schaufler
Date: Thu Mar 08 2007 - 13:31:09 EST
--- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's unfortunate, agreed, but
>
> use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a
> no-go.
You're going to have to justify this assertion.
I know of at least one work-in-progress for which
LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity
claims of SELinux.
Casey Schaufler
casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/