Re: [PATCH 17/20] SMP: Implement on_cpu()

[Avi Kivity]

[cc list restored]

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> This defines on_cpu() which is similar to smp_call_function_single()
>> except that it works if cpu happens to be the current cpu.  Can also be
>> seen as a complement to on_each_cpu() (which also doesn't treat the
>> current cpu specially).
>>     
>
> I think it would be better to fix smp_call_function_single to just
> handle this case transparently. There aren't that many callers yet because it is
> fairly new.
>   

Well, smp_call_function_single() is arch specific whereas on_cpu() is
generic code.  Perhaps rename smp_call_function_single() to
__smp_call_function_single() and on_cpu() to smp_call_function_single()?

I dislike the loss of symmetry though.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/