Re: uninline check_signature()

[Heiko Carstens]

On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 06:02:55PM +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=cc2ea416b2aa04d0c34ff2281a23dae5b76b7b3b
> Commit:     cc2ea416b2aa04d0c34ff2281a23dae5b76b7b3b
> Parent:     4e7bd66318b3ae60fbba7d886d9a98b71ffbf74e
> Author:     Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Sun Jul 15 23:41:38 2007 -0700
> Committer:  Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Mon Jul 16 09:05:50 2007 -0700
> 
>     uninline check_signature()
>     
>     This is a rather bizarre thing to have inlined in io.h.  Stick it in lib/
>     instead.
>     
>     While we're there, despaghetti it a bit, and fix its off-by-one behaviour when
>     passed a zero length.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/io.h    |   29 ++---------------------------
>  lib/Makefile          |    2 +-
>  lib/check_signature.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Hmm.. this breaks s390 and probably m68k and UML as well:

  CC      lib/check_signature.o
lib/check_signature.c: In function 'check_signature':
lib/check_signature.c:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'readb'

Actually we tried to fix this, but it looks like there was no final
conclusion: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/28/98

Now what? Revert until things have been sorted out?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/