Re: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.

[Alan Cox]

O> In that case, we might as well just always do the scheduled_delayed_work() 
> with a zero timeout as per the earlier patch. I'd still like to know who 
> *cares*, though? Why not leave it at 1?

I don't think it really matters too much on modern systems so long as we
keep the flush_to_ldisc out of IRQ context. Historically we tried to
batch the ldisc processing but I doubt any modern box cares too much
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/