Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> The only expectation is that a process with a lower nice level gets more
> time. Any other expectation is a bug.

Yes, users are buggy, they expect a lot of stupid things...
Is this really reason enough to break this?

What exactly is the damage if setpriority() accepts a few more levels?

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/