[AVR32] Fix atomic_add_unless() and atomic_sub_unless()

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

These functions depend on "result" being initalized to 0, but "result"
is not included as an input constraint to the inline assembly block
following its initialization, only as an output constraint. Thus gcc
thinks it doesn't need to initialize it, so result ends up undefined
if the "unless" condition is true.

This fixes an oops in sunrpc where the faulty atomics caused
rpciod_up() to not start the workqueue as it should.

Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/asm-avr32/atomic.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h b/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h
index b9c2548..7ef3862 100644
--- a/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h
+++ b/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline int atomic_sub_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
 		"	mov	%1, 1\n"
 		"1:"
 		: "=&r"(tmp), "=&r"(result), "=o"(v->counter)
-		: "m"(v->counter), "rKs21"(a), "rKs21"(u)
+		: "m"(v->counter), "rKs21"(a), "rKs21"(u), "1"(result)
 		: "cc", "memory");
 
 	return result;
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
 			"	mov	%1, 1\n"
 			"1:"
 			: "=&r"(tmp), "=&r"(result), "=o"(v->counter)
-			: "m"(v->counter), "r"(a), "ir"(u)
+			: "m"(v->counter), "r"(a), "ir"(u), "1"(result)
 			: "cc", "memory");
 	}
 
-- 
1.5.2.3

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/