Re: Linux 2.4.35 tree abandoned/delayed?

[Tony Borras]

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 02:10:58 +0200
"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > file: patch-2.4.34.3.bz2 has the corruption at line 213:
> >   goto errout
> >
> > That is where that came from, when I patched my 2.4.34 to
> > arrive at 2.4.34.5, before applying the 2.4.35.rc5 patch!
> >
> That sounds wrong. To the best of my knowledge, the 2.4.35-rc5
> patch should be applied on top of 2.4.34, not on top of
> 2.4.34.5 ...
> 
> -- 
> Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
> Don't top-post 
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please     
> http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

You are absolutely right!  Since I was keeping a 2.4.34.current
and 2.4.35.pre5 is just a pre, I stupidly slapped it on top at
my current build tree!

too much Summer partying!

Thanks a lot!
TonyB

There are 10 types of people in this world, those that read
binary and those who don't!

--
  __      __  _     I N C.               http://www.sysdev.org
/ __|\\// __||  \  __   __          /         tonyb@xxxxxxxxxx
\__ \ \/\__ \||)|/ O_)\/ /        \/  System Tools / Utilities
|___/ || ___/|_ /\___|\_/        WIntel / Linux Device Drivers

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/