[PATCH 1/3] lguest: fix sense if IF flag on interrupt injection

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Fri Jul 20 2007 - 08:11:42 EST


The sense of the IF bit is backwards in the host interrupt handling.

This means we always save "IF=1" on the stack when injecting an
interrupt. It turns out this is almost always correct (unless the
guest is taking a page fault in an interrupt due to an unpopulated
vmalloc mapping), so went unnoticed.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -r 209f5cd5cda5 drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c
--- a/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c Fri Jul 20 14:53:40 2007 +1000
+++ b/drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c Fri Jul 20 21:34:06 2007 +1000
@@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ static void set_guest_interrupt(struct l
ss = lg->regs->ss;
}

- /* We use IF bit in eflags to indicate whether irqs were disabled
- (it's always 0, since irqs are enabled when guest is running). */
+ /* We use IF bit in eflags to indicate whether irqs were enabled
+ (it's always 1, since irqs are enabled when guest is running). */
eflags = lg->regs->eflags;
- if (get_user(irq_enable, &lg->lguest_data->irq_enabled))
- irq_enable = 0;
- eflags |= (irq_enable & X86_EFLAGS_IF);
+ if (get_user(irq_enable, &lg->lguest_data->irq_enabled) == 0
+ && !(irq_enable & X86_EFLAGS_IF))
+ eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_IF;

push_guest_stack(lg, &gstack, eflags);
push_guest_stack(lg, &gstack, lg->regs->cs);


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/