On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:03:00PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 7/21/07, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I would much more prefer this functionality to be integrated into unifdef.
> >There is no good reason to have two different preprocesisng methonds, one
> >being the sed based one and the other the unidef one.
> >
> >A sinlge dedicated program that contian the sum of the functionality would
> >be faster too.
>
> which functionality ? normalizing of whitespace or all these
> linux-specific hacks ? unifdef serves one specific function which is
> stated in its manpage: remove preprocessor conditionals from code.
At present the kernel has a private copy of unidef. So adjusting the
private copy for the needs of the kernels seems like a god plan.