Re: [GIT PULL] Trivial sh64 updates for 2.6.23-rc1

[Jan Dittmer]

Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:21PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
>> Paul Mundt wrote:
>> Tangential question. Which is the currently recommended cross toolchain
>> for sh64? With "gcc 3.2 20020529", "binutils 020306 20030206" (some
>> binary toolchain from ~2 years ago somewhere off the web) I get [1]

<error snipped>

>> gcc 3.4.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x don't build for me from source
>> (target -superh-linux-gnu, binutils 2.15.x or 2.17.x).
> 
> I've been using sh64-linux targetted toolchains created from the gentoo
> crossdev, which works fine with stock versions. I can send you a tarball
> of the toolchain off-list if you like.

Binutils, gcc versions would be fine to. Meanwhile I got binutils
2.17.50.0.17.20070615 and gcc 4.1.3 20070704 (prerelease) to compile
(supplying it with uclibc- and lk-headers). But compiling 2.6.22-git17
now fails with

  CC      drivers/video/cfbimgblt.o
  CC      drivers/video/fb_defio.o
  LD      drivers/video/built-in.o
  LD      drivers/built-in.o
sh64-linux-ld: sh3 architecture of input file `drivers/media/built-in.o'
is incompatible with sh5 output
sh64-linux-ld: sh3 architecture of input file `drivers/i2c/built-in.o'
is incompatible with sh5 output
make[2]: *** [drivers/built-in.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2
make: *** [_all] Error 2

Known?

Thanks,

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/