Re: [GIT PULL] Trivial sh64 updates for 2.6.23-rc1

[Paul Mundt]

On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:18:27PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> >> 2.17.50.0.17.20070615 and gcc 4.1.3 20070704 (prerelease) to compile
> >> (supplying it with uclibc- and lk-headers). But compiling 2.6.22-git17
> >> now fails with
> >>
> >>   CC      drivers/video/cfbimgblt.o
> >>   CC      drivers/video/fb_defio.o
> >>   LD      drivers/video/built-in.o
> >>   LD      drivers/built-in.o
> >> sh64-linux-ld: sh3 architecture of input file `drivers/media/built-in.o'
> >> is incompatible with sh5 output
> >> sh64-linux-ld: sh3 architecture of input file `drivers/i2c/built-in.o'
> >> is incompatible with sh5 output
> >> make[2]: *** [drivers/built-in.o] Error 1
> >> make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2
> >> make: *** [_all] Error 2
> >>
> >> Known?
> >>
> > It's known that empty objects require explicit tuning for the ABI,
> > however, this has never been anything that was fatal. If you flip
> > something on within each of those subsystems, does the error go away?
> 
> Yes, thanks this fixes it. Would you accept a patch to modify the
> defconfig so that it builds by default? Would be most useful for
> my pet project (http://l4x.org/k/). A fixed toolchain would of course
> also be nice.
> 
I'll certainly apply patches that help getting it building, so feel free
to send updates for that. As I also noted, the empty object thing is
non-fatal with my toolchain, so I'd also appreciate it if you could put
a tarball of yours up somewhere so this is a bit easier to verify. I
suspect this is just something we're going to have to change in binutils,
however.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/