Re: [1/2] 2.6.23-rc1: known regressions

From: Al Viro
Date: Mon Jul 23 2007 - 07:26:16 EST


On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:17:05AM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:

> Here's a trivial patch for this one.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> asus-laptop: Sync with changes to led class
>
> Driver was broken by commit f8a7c6fe14f556ca8eeddce258cb21392d0c3a2f
> leds: Convert from struct class_device to struct device
>
> Convert the LEDs class from struct class_device to struct device
> since class_device is scheduled for removal.
>
> Use (struct led_classdev).dev instead of (struct led_classdev).class_dev

It doesn't fix the real bug in there - if you look carefully at the code,
you'll see that we don't get to these checks if allocation fails halfway
through (and we leak in that case) *and* these checks are not needed at
all if failure happens elsewhere.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/