Re: CTL_UNNUMBERED (Re: [PATCH] 9p: Don't use binary sysctl numbers.)
From: Eric Van Hensbergen
Date: Mon Jul 23 2007 - 14:09:29 EST
On 7/23/07, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It doesn't really matter (for me) whether it is sysctl or sysfs
interface. The sysctl approach seemed easier to implement. If the
consensus is to use sysfs, I'll send a patch (for 2.6.24).
Sorry for the incorrect implementation, I guess I stole the code from
unappropriate place :)
I think this is appropriate for a "fix" submission to the 2.6.23-rc
series. If you don't have the bandwidth right now, I'll look at
reworking it, or at the very least just removing the sysctl interface.
-eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/