Re: [PATCH 000 of 35] Refactor block layer to improve support forstacked devices.

[Avi Kivity]

NeilBrown wrote:
> To achieve this, the "for_each" macros are now somewhat more complex.
> For example, rq_for_each_segment is:
>
> #define bio_for_each_segment_offset(bv, bio, _i, offs, _size)		\
> 	for (_i.i = 0, _i.offset = (bio)->bi_offset + offs,		\
> 		 _i.size = min_t(int, _size, (bio)->bi_size - offs);   	\
> 	     _i.i < (bio)->bi_vcnt && _i.size > 0;			\
> 	     _i.i++)							\
> 		if (bv = *bio_iovec_idx((bio), _i.i),			\
> 		    bv.bv_offset += _i.offset,				\
> 		    bv.bv_len <= _i.offset				\
> 		    ? (_i.offset -= bv.bv_len, 0)			\
> 		    : (bv.bv_len -= _i.offset,				\
> 		       _i.offset = 0,					\
> 		       bv.bv_len < _i.size				\
> 		       ? (_i.size -= bv.bv_len, 1)			\
> 		       : (bv.bv_len = _i.size,				\
> 			  _i.size = 0,					\
> 			  bv.bv_len > 0)))
>
> #define bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, __i)				\
> 		bio_for_each_segment_offset(bv, bio, __i, 0, (bio)->bi_size)
>
> It does some with some explanatory text in a comment, but it is still
> a bit daunting.  Any suggestions on making this more approachable
> would be very welcome.
>
>   

Well, I hesitate to state the obvious, but how about:

#define bio_for_each_segment_offset(bv, bio, _i, offs, _size) \
   for (bio_iterator_init(&_i, ...); bio_iterator_cont(&_i, ...); 
bio_iterator_advance(&_i, ...)) \
        if (bio_iterator_want_segment(&_i, ...))

While this doesn't remove the complexity, at least it's readable.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/