Re: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on80386 and 80486

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Aug 12 2007 10:54, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

>Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:54:35 -0400
>From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>To:  <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,  <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>,
>    Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>,  <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [patch 01/23] Fall back on interrupt disable in cmpxchg8b on 80386 and
>     80486
>
>Actually, on 386, cmpxchg and cmpxchg_local fall back on
>cmpxchg_386_u8/16/32: it disables interruptions around non atomic
>updates to mimic the cmpxchg behavior.
>
>The comment:
>/* Poor man's cmpxchg for 386. Unsuitable for SMP */
>
>already present in cmpxchg_386_u32 tells much about how this cmpxchg
>implementation should not be used in a SMP context. However, the cmpxchg_local
>can perfectly use this fallback, since it only needs to be atomic wrt the local
>cpu.
>
>This patch adds a cmpxchg_486_u64 and uses it as a fallback for cmpxchg64
>and cmpxchg64_local on 80386 and 80486.

hm, but why is it called cmpxchg_486 when the other functions are called
cmpxchg_386?


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/