Re: [PATCH 2/5] exec: simplify ->sighand switching
From: Roland McGrath
Date: Sat Aug 18 2007 - 19:11:43 EST
> There is no any reason to do recalc_sigpending() after changing ->sighand.
> To begin with, recalc_sigpending() does not take ->sighand into account.
I agree. I think that call dates from before some other cleanups in that
code, when ->signal was changed there. At the time, it was the most
conservative change to leave recalc_sigpending in case the side effects it
used to have were desireable (we've since decided to change those anyway).
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/