Re: [PATCH 3/5] exec: simplify the new ->sighand allocation
From: Roland McGrath
Date: Sat Aug 18 2007 - 19:13:17 EST
> - ENOMEM still can happen after de_thread(), ->sighand is not the last
> object we have to allocate
As long as this is true, I think it's the incontrovertible argument there
is no reason not to simplify it. (Not that I don't also agree with your
other reasons).
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/