Re: [patch] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:13:15 -0400
Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since you have been involved a lot with ext3 development,
> which kinds of workloads do you think will show a performance
> degradation with Arjan's patch?   What should I test?

Gee.  Expect the unexpected ;)

One problem might be when kjournald is doing its ordered-mode data
writeback at the start of commit.  That writeout will now be
higher-priority and might impact other tasks which are doing synchronous
file overwrites (ie: no commits) or O_DIRECT reads or writes or just plain
old reads.

If the aggregate number of seeks over the long term is the same as before
then of course the overall throughput should be the same, in which case the
impact might only be upon latency.  However if for some reason the total
number of seeks is increased then there will be throughput impacts as well.

So as a starting point I guess one could set up a
copy-a-kernel-tree-in-a-loop running in the background and then see what
impact that has upon a large-linear-read, upon a
read-a-different-kernel-tree and upon some database-style multithreaded
O_DIRECT reader/overwriter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/