Re: Tesing of / bugs in new timerfd API

[Davide Libenzi]

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote:

> > Can you try the two patches below? I tried them on my 32 bit box (one of
> > the rare beasts still lingering around here) and it seems to be working
> > fine (those go on top of the previous ones).
> 
> Against 2.6.24-rc5, I applied first your earlier patches ("v3") and
> then the newest patch.  My tests confirm that:
> 
> > This fixed the 32 bit tick-count truncation, and makes the time returned
> > to be the remaining time till the next expiration.
> 
> Are you going to resubmit a new patch set that includes these latest changes?

Yes, I'll send them out to Andrew today.


- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/