Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:13:28 -0500 (EST)
Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> sky2 can use deferrable timer for watchdog - reduces wakeups from idle per 
> second.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> --- linux-2.6/drivers/net/sky2.c	2007-12-07 10:04:39.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6-work/drivers/net/sky2.c	2007-12-18 20:07:58.000000000 -0500
> @@ -4230,7 +4230,10 @@
>   			sky2_show_addr(dev1);
>   	}
> 
> -	setup_timer(&hw->watchdog_timer, sky2_watchdog, (unsigned long) hw);
> +	hw->watchdog_timer.function = sky2_watchdog;
> +	hw->watchdog_timer.data = (unsigned long) hw;
> +	init_timer_deferrable(&hw->watchdog_timer);
> +
>   	INIT_WORK(&hw->restart_work, sky2_restart);
> 
>   	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, hw);

Does it really reduce the wakeup's or only change who gets charged by powertop?
The system is going to wakeup once a second anyway. Looks to me that if the
timer is using round_jiffies(), that setting deferrable just changes the accounting.

My interpretation of the api is:
   * round_jiffies()  - timer wants to wakeup but isn't precise about when so schedule
                        on next second when system will wake up anyway;
                        e.g why meetings are usually scheduled on the hour

   * deferrable       - timer doesn't have to really wakeup but wants to happen near
                        a particular time. e.g. "I'll meet you at the pub around 8pm"

Therefore doing deferrable is unnecessary for timers using round_jiffies unless system
is so good at doing timers that it is going to skip doing timer once per second.

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/