Re: [rfc][patch] mm: madvise(WILLNEED) for anonymous memory
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Dec 20 2007 - 12:17:15 EST
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 11:11 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:53:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 15:26 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > > The asynch code: perhaps not worth doing for MADV_WILLNEED alone,
> > > but might prove useful for more general use when swapping in.
> > > Not really the same as Con's swap prefetch, but worth looking
> > > at that for reference. But I guess this becomes a much bigger
> > > issue than you were intending to get into here.
> >
> > heh, yeah, got somewhat more complex that I'd hoped for.
> >
> > last patch for today (not even compile tested), will do a proper patch
> > and test it tomorrow.
> >
> > ---
> > A best effort MADV_WILLNEED implementation for anonymous memory.
> >
> > It adds a batch method to the page table walk routines so we can
> > copy a few ptes while holding the kmap, which makes it possible to
> > allocate the backing pages using GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Yuck. We actually need to just fix the atomic kmap issue in the
> existing pagemap code rather than add a new method, I think.
>
> If performance of map/unmap is too slow at a granularity of 1, we can
> add some internal batching in the CONFIG_HIGHPTE case.
OK, sounds like a much better idea indeed. Will implement that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/