Re: [PATCH][RFC] fast file mapping for loop

[Chris Mason]

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:07:40 +0100
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > I split and merged the patch into five bits (added ext3 support),
> > > so perhaps that would be easier for people to read/review.
> > > Attached and also exist in the loop-extent_map branch here:

Thanks!

> > > 
> > > http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=loop-extent_map
> > 
> > Seems my ext3 version doesn't work, it craps out in
> > ext3_get_blocks_handle() triggering this bug:
> > 
> > J_ASSERT(handle != NULL || create == 0);
> > 
> > I'll see if I can fix that, being fairly fs ignorant...
> 
> This works, but probably pretty suboptimal (should end the new journal
> in map_io_complete()?). And yes I know the >> 9 isn't correct, since
> the fs block size is larger. Just making sure that we always have
> enough blocks.

You can use DIO_CREDITS instead of len >> 9, just like the ext3
O_DIRECT code does.  Your current patch is fine, except it breaks
data=ordered rules.  My plan to work within data=ordered:

1) Inside ext3_map_extent (while the transaction was running), increment
a counter in the ext3 journal for number of pending IOs.  Then end the
transaction handle.

2) Drop this counter inside the IO completion call

3) Change the ext3 commit code to wait for the IO count to be zero.

I'll give it a shot later this week, until then your current patch is
just data=writeback, which is good enough for testing.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/