Re: [patch 8/9] unprivileged mounts: propagation: inherit ownerfrom parent
From: Serge E. Hallyn
Date: Tue Jan 15 2008 - 09:21:26 EST
Quoting Miklos Szeredi (miklos@xxxxxxxxxx):
> > Quoting Miklos Szeredi (miklos@xxxxxxxxxx):
> > > From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > On mount propagation, let the owner of the clone be inherited from the
> > > parent into which it has been propagated. Also if the parent has the
> > > "nosuid" flag, set this flag for the child as well.
> >
> > What about nodev?
>
> Hmm, I think the nosuid thing is meant to prevent suid mounts being
> introduced into a "suidless" namespace. This doesn't apply to dev
> mounts, which are quite safe in a suidless environment, as long as the
> user is not able to create devices. But that should be taken care of
> by capability tests.
>
> I'll update the description.
Hmm,
Part of me wants to say the safest thing for now would be to refuse
mounts propagation from non-user mounts to user mounts.
I assume you're thinking about a fully user-mounted chroot, where
the user woudl still want to be able to stick in a cdrom and have
it automounted under /mnt/cdrom, propagated from the root mounts ns?
But then are there no devices which the user could create on a floppy
while inserted into his own laptop, owned by his own uid, then insert
into this machine, and use the device under the auto-mounted /dev/floppy
to gain inappropriate access?
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/