Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits

[James Morris]

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Really?  I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led
> to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which
> indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every
> conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it.

FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see 
any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge.

You can add my reviewed-by.

I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm.  

File capabilities are at least marked experimental, although it's not 
clear what the criteria would be to unmark them.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/