Re: [PATCH] per-process securebits

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2008-02-01 20:07:01, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > Really?  I'd feel a lot more comfortable if yesterday's version 1 had led
> > to a stream of comments from suitably-knowledgeable kernel developers which
> > indicated that those developers had scrutinised this code from every
> > conceivable angle and had declared themselves 100% happy with it.
> 
> FWIW, I've reviewed the patch in detail a couple of times, and don't see 
> any issues with it that haven't already been raised by Serge.
> 
> You can add my reviewed-by.
> 
> I think it does need more eyes, and some time baking in -mm.  

I don't thing -mm baking helps here. People playing with -mm are not
the ones trying to hack your box.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/