Re: [PATCH 7/8] ide: add struct ide_port_info instances to legacy host drivers
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Date: Fri Feb 01 2008 - 18:23:26 EST
Hi,
On Monday 28 January 2008, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> > * Remove 'struct pci_dev *dev' argument from ide_hwif_setup_dma().
>
> > * Un-static ide_hwif_setup_dma() and add CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI=n version.
>
> > * Add 'const struct ide_port_info *d' argument to ide_device_add[_all]().
>
> > * Factor out generic ports init from ide_pci_setup_ports() to ide_init_port(),
> > move it to ide-probe.c and call it in in ide_device_add_all() instead of
> > ide_pci_setup_ports().
>
> > * Move ->mate setup to ide_device_add_all() from ide_port_init().
>
> > * Add IDE_HFLAG_NO_AUTOTUNE host flag for host drivers that don't enable
> > ->autotune currently.
>
> > * Setup hwif->chipset in ide_init_port() but iff pi->chipset is set
> > (to not override setup done by ide_hwif_configure()).
>
> > * Add ETRAX host handling to ide_device_add_all().
>
> > * cmd640.c: set IDE_HFLAG_ABUSE_* also for CONFIG_BLK_DEV_CMD640_ENHANCED=n.
>
> > * pmac.c: make pmac_ide_setup_dma() return an error value and move DMA masks
> > setup to pmac_ide_setup_device().
>
> > * Add 'struct ide_port_info' instances to legacy host drivers, pass them to
> > ide_device_add() calls and then remove open-coded ports initialization.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > Index: b/drivers/ide/arm/icside.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/drivers/ide/arm/icside.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ide/arm/icside.c
> > @@ -459,11 +456,19 @@ icside_register_v5(struct icside_state *
> >
> > idx[0] = hwif->index;
> >
> > - ide_device_add(idx);
> > + ide_device_add(idx, NULL);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct ide_port_info icside_v6_port_info __initdata = {
> > + .host_flags = IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE |
> > + IDE_HFLAG_NO_DMA | /* no SFF-style DMA */
> > + IDE_HFLAG_NO_AUTOTUNE,
> > + .mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA2,
> > + .swdma_mask = ATA_SWDMA2,
> > +};
> > +
>
> Interesting... this driver's support for SWDMA0 is broken since the cycle
> should be 960 ns long, not 480, and SWDMA2 is underclocked using the same
> cycle as SWDMA1, 480 ns...
Added Russell to Cc:.
> > Index: b/drivers/ide/cris/ide-cris.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/drivers/ide/cris/ide-cris.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ide/cris/ide-cris.c
> > @@ -753,6 +753,15 @@ static void cris_set_dma_mode(ide_drive_
> > cris_ide_set_speed(TYPE_DMA, 0, strobe, hold);
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct ide_port_info cris_port_info __initdata = {
> > + .chipset = ide_etrax100,
> > + .host_flags = IDE_HFLAG_NO_ATAPI_DMA |
> > + IDE_HFLAG_NO_DMA, /* no SFF-style DMA */
> > + .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
> > + .udma_mask = cris_ultra_mask,
>
> Hm, I wonder which value it will assume, 0x07 or 0? Not sure even after
> looking at the source... :-)
This is tricky since it depends on the CRIS version
(0x07 on CRIS V32 and 0x00 on CRIS V10).
> > + .mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA2,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int __init init_e100_ide(void)
> > {
> > hw_regs_t hw;
> > Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
> > @@ -1289,12 +1289,86 @@ static void hwif_register_devices(ide_hw
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -int ide_device_add_all(u8 *idx)
> > +static void ide_init_port(ide_hwif_t *hwif, unsigned int port,
> > + const struct ide_port_info *d)
> > {
> > - ide_hwif_t *hwif;
> > + if (d->chipset != ide_etrax100)
> > + hwif->channel = port;
>
> Hm, what's so special about ide_etrax100?
The driver supports *4* channels and it didn't set ->channel at all.
Since in the meantime ide-cris got marked as BROKEN I guess that a patch
removing above code would be OK.
> > +int ide_device_add_all(u8 idx[MAX_HWIFS], const struct ide_port_info *d)
>
> Function prototype doesn't match with one from <linux/ide.h> which has the
> first argument as a pointer...
I fixed it locally, thanks.
> > +{
> > + ide_hwif_t *hwif, *mate = NULL;
> > int i, rc = 0;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < MAX_HWIFS; i++) {
> > + if (d == NULL || idx[i] == 0xff) {
>
> Why check for (d == NULL) every time and not do it once and break from the
> loop or even do it before the loop?
To save on some code lines and resulting code size
(ide_device_add_all is not performance critical).
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/