Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance duringsuspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected)

[Ingo Molnar]

* Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> yeah, I was already on a half-way to check it out.
> 
> It does fix a problem for me.
> 
> Don't forget to take along these 2 fixes from Peter's patch:
> 
> - fix break usage in do_each_thread() { } while_each_thread().
> - fix the hotplug switch stmt, a fall-through case was broken.

Dmitry, i sent Peter's fix(es) below to Linus. Do you concur that it 
fixes all the practical and theoretical problems you could see with the 
code too?

	Ingo

--------------->
Subject: debug: softlockup looping fix
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>

Rafael J. Wysocki reported weird, multi-seconds delays during
suspend/resume and bisected it back to:

  commit 82a1fcb90287052aabfa235e7ffc693ea003fe69
  Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
  Date:   Fri Jan 25 21:08:02 2008 +0100

      softlockup: automatically detect hung TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks

fix it:

 - restore the old wakeup mechanism
 - fix break usage in do_each_thread() { } while_each_thread().
 - fix the hotplug switch stmt, a fall-through case was broken.

Bisected-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/softlockup.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/softlockup.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ linux/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
 
 	now = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
 
+	/* Wake up the high-prio watchdog task every second: */
+	if (now > (touch_timestamp + 1))
+		wake_up_process(per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu));
+
 	/* Warn about unreasonable delays: */
 	if (now <= (touch_timestamp + softlockup_thresh))
 		return;
@@ -191,11 +195,11 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_t
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	do_each_thread(g, t) {
 		if (!--max_count)
-			break;
+			goto unlock;
 		if (t->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
 			check_hung_task(t, now);
 	} while_each_thread(g, t);
-
+ unlock:
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 }
 
@@ -218,14 +222,19 @@ static int watchdog(void *__bind_cpu)
 	 * debug-printout triggers in softlockup_tick().
 	 */
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		touch_softlockup_watchdog();
-		msleep_interruptible(10000);
+		schedule();
+
+		if (kthread_should_stop())
+			break;
 
 		if (this_cpu != check_cpu)
 			continue;
 
 		if (sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
 			check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(this_cpu);
+
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -259,13 +268,6 @@ cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 		wake_up_process(per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu));
 		break;
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
-	case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
-		if (!per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu))
-			break;
-		/* Unbind so it can run.  Fall thru. */
-		kthread_bind(per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu),
-			     any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map));
 	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
 	case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
 		if (hotcpu == check_cpu) {
@@ -275,6 +277,14 @@ cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 			check_cpu = any_online_cpu(temp_cpu_online_map);
 		}
 		break;
+
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
+	case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
+		if (!per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu))
+			break;
+		/* Unbind so it can run.  Fall thru. */
+		kthread_bind(per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu),
+			     any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map));
 	case CPU_DEAD:
 	case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
 		p = per_cpu(watchdog_task, hotcpu);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/