Re: bug in checkpatch (on pointers to typedefs?)

[Andy Whitcroft]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:58:08PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> OK, but the return type doesn't have to be in the patched line, it could be in
> a synchronization line or even missing if the function has a long multi-line argument
> list.

Ok, I guess thats fair criticism.  Could you check out the current
checkpatch-next (0.14-8-g3737366 or later -9, -10 etc), and see if
that works.  It seems to on the simple examples you sent me :).

Thanks.

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/