Re: [Broken] PCI: clean up resource alignment management
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Apr 22 2008 - 21:27:20 EST
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> > > Yes, exactly. My fault - I somehow missed the cardbus stuff...
> > Ok, this patch looks sane, but ..
> > Patch entirely UNTESTED!
>
> I just tested Linus's patch and it works.
Thanks, and I could test it myself (without any actual card, but at least
I could see the failure to even set up the bridge, and the fix).
So I committed it.
When we did the original commit that caused this, we had considered having
a separate "alignment" value, but I had discarded it because I didn't
think there was any actual hardware that could even use it. But this
cardbus thing shows that I was wrong - the two bits may have been clever,
and it works no worse than the old setup (and slightly better), but I
think the separate alignment field would probably have been better.
Anyway, it's probably not worth worrying about now. It's not like we've
ever _needed_ the finer-granularity alignment, so I think we're ok with
the current setup, but if we ever decide to add the alignment field after
all, somebody should remind me/Ink about the cardbus thing.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/