Re: [PATCH] Extend list debugging to cover hlists

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:14:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> linux-next is a better tree against which to prepare 2.6.x+1 patches.

Is there a reason to wait for 2.6.x+1?  People are having problems today
with corrupt hlists.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/