Re: [PATCH] x86: janitor work in bugs.c

[Ingo Molnar]

* Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> -/* trap_init() enabled FXSR and company _before_ testing for FP problems here. */
> +/* 
> + * trap_init() enabled FXSR and company _before_ testing for FP problems
> + * here.
> + */
>  	/* Test for the divl bug.. */
>  	__asm__("fninit\n\t"
>  		"fldl %1\n\t"

the two comments should be merged, somehow like this:

> +	/* 
> +	 * trap_init() enabled FXSR and company _before_ testing for FP 
> +	 * problems here.
> +	 *
> +	 * Test for the divl bug:
> +	 */
>  	__asm__("fninit\n\t"

>  	check_popad();
> -	init_utsname()->machine[1] = '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
> +	init_utsname()->machine[1] = '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 :
> +	    boot_cpu_data.x86);

hm, that looks a bit ugly. It's nicer to have something like:

> +	init_utsname()->machine[1] = '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 :
> +							boot_cpu_data.x86);

i.e. have a continuation of the right side of the expression, and have 
it close to where it was broken from.

or just do:

> +	init_utsname()->machine[1] =
> +		 '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/