[PATCH 1/3] h8300: Use packed struct rather than memmove forunaligned access

[Harvey Harrison]

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
There are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see
any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove
version could be removed?

 include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
index b8d06c7..ab851e7 100644
--- a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H
 #define _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H
 
-#include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
 #include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
 #include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
 
-- 
1.5.6.290.gc4e15


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/