[PATCH 3/3] xtensa: Use packed struct rather than memmove forunaligned access

[Harvey Harrison]

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
ïThere are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see
any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove
version could be removed?

 include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h b/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h
index 8f3424f..1a242b2 100644
--- a/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@
 #define _ASM_XTENSA_UNALIGNED_H
 
 #ifdef __XTENSA_EL__
-# include <linux/unaligned/le_memmove.h>
+# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h>
 # include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
 # include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
 # define get_unaligned	__get_unaligned_le
 # define put_unaligned	__put_unaligned_le
 #elif defined(__XTENSA_EB__)
-# include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h>
+# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
 # include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
 # include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
 # define get_unaligned	__get_unaligned_be
-- 
1.5.6.290.gc4e15

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/