Re: [PATCH 05/05] x86: Rename paravirtualized TSC functions

[Ingo Molnar]

* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> first round bisect all works..
> 
> it seems make oldconfig change setting between different setting...

yeah. The thing i do is this: i create a .config.bisect and at every 
bisection step i copy it into .config and do a 'make oldconfig'.

this means that options are picked up again, even if a 'dive back into 
the past' causes a bisection point to lose a config setting.

> 
> diff .config config.full.good
> 4c4
> < # Thu Jul 10 00:52:52 2008
> ---
> > # Thu Jul 10 00:40:03 2008
> 295,296c295
> < CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL=y
> < CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
> ---
> > # CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is not set
> 
> it seems some recent change doesn't like stackprotector.

then my guess would be on:

 89d7bb5: x86_64: add workaround for no %gs-based percpu

you might want to try your luck and revert that one alone from latest 
tip/master.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/