[PATCH] nohz: don't stop idle tick if softirqs are pending.

From: Heiko Carstens
Date: Fri Jul 11 2008 - 05:09:48 EST


Subject: [PATCH] nohz: don't stop idle tick if softirqs are pending.

From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>

In case a cpu goes idle but softirqs are pending only an error message is
printed to the console. It may take a very long time until the pending
softirqs will finally be executed. Worst case would be a hanging system.

With this patch the timer tick just continues and the softirqs will be
executed after the next interrupt. Still a delay but better than a
hanging system.

Currently we have at least two device drivers on s390 which under certain
circumstances schedule a tasklet from process context. This is a reason
why we can end up with pending softirqs when going idle. Fixing these
drivers seems to be non-trivial.
However there is no question that the drivers should be fixed.
This patch shouldn't be considered as a bug fix. It just is intended to
keep a system running even if device drivers are buggy.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(void)
local_softirq_pending());
ratelimit++;
}
+ goto end;
}

ts->idle_calls++;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/