Re: [SUGGESTION]: drop virtual merge accounting in I/O requests

[Mikulas Patocka]

> > BTW. what should the block device driver do when it receives a mapping
> > error? (if it aborts the request and it was write request, there will be
> > data corruption).
>
> I'm not sure how a aborted request can corrupt data on disk.

Writes are done by an async daemon and no one checks for their completion 
status. If there are three writes to directory, inode table and inode 
bitmap and one of these writes fail, there's no code to undo the other 
two. So the filesystem will be corrupted on write failure.

> > Is it even legal to return IOMMU error in case where no
> > real hardware error or overflow happened?
>
> Of course, it's legal. It's a common event like kinda OOM. It's very
> possible with old IOMMUs that have the small I/O space. A SCSI driver
> retries a failed request later. But note that some drivers are still
> not able to handle that.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121300637114672&w=2

So should it return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY? Or something other?

Unfortunatelly, many of the drivers contain BUG_ON or no check at all.

Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/