Re: [BUG] /proc/mtrr I/O error
From: Bob Tracy
Date: Tue Sep 02 2008 - 23:58:34 EST
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 04:08:00PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:38:24 -0500
> > Bob Tracy <rct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> With 2.6.27-rc4 and possibly earlier kernels, I see the following:
> >>
> >> $ cat /proc/mtrr
> >> cat: /proc/mtrr: Input/output error
> >>
> >> Processor is an AMD K6-III/450.
> >>
> >
> > static int mtrr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > {
> > if (!mtrr_if)
> > return -EIO;
> >
> >
> >
> > Beats me. Perhaps something broke in mtrr_bp_init().
> >
> > It would be useful to know if 2.6.26 worked OK.
> >
>
> two patches needed..
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/1/307
> [PATCH 4/6] x86: delay early cpu initialization until cpuid is done
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/1/308
> [PATCH 5/6] x86: move mtrr cpu cap setting early in early_init_xxxx
Krzysztof Helt's quick-and-dirty patch posted a few days ago did the
trick, but from the descriptions of the above patches, they address the
problem properly. Here's what "cat /proc/mtrr" shows with Helt's patch
and the "nv" driver active for my GeForce2 MX 400 card:
$ cat /proc/mtrr
reg00: base=0xd0000000 (3328MB), size= 64MB: write-combining, count=1
MTRR sanitization seems to be working properly: the same command shows
nothing when X isn't running.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy | "I was a beta tester for dirt. They never did
rct@xxxxxxxx | get all the bugs out." - Steve McGrew on /.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/