Re: [PATCH git latest] drivers/scsi: fixing wrong comment beforenew_buffer_tape()

[Alan Cox]

> > Looks true to me for the current versions of the code. In fact it is only
> > ever called from the initialisation function that I can see so chunks of
> > the code could simply go away as well as bits of the comment. Ditto the
> > one in drivers/scsi/st.c
> >
> > Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> 
> I am sorry I didn't quite understand. You mean it is true that caller
> must hold os_scsi_tapes_lock?

Sorry - I mean what you claim is true - that the comment is incorrect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/