Re: [PATCH 2/4] Add replace_page(), change the mapping of pte fromone page into another

From: Izik Eidus
Date: Wed Nov 12 2008 - 06:13:31 EST


Avi Kivity wrote:
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
Can I make a question ? (I'm working for memory cgroup.)

Now, we do charge to anonymous page when
- charge(+1) when it's mapped firstly (mapcount 0->1)
- uncharge(-1) it's fully unmapped (mapcount 1->0) vir page_remove_rmap().

My quesion is
- PageKSM pages are not necessary to be tracked by memory cgroup ?
When we reaplacing page using page_replace() we have:
oldpage - > anonymous page that is going to be replaced by newpage
newpage -> kernel allocated page (KsmPage)
so about oldpage we are calling page_remove_rmap() that will notify cgroup
and about newpage it wont be count inside cgroup beacuse it is file rmap page
(we are calling to page_add_file_rmap), so right now PageKSM wont ever be tracked by cgroup.

- Can we know that "the page is just replaced and we don't necessary to do
charge/uncharge".

The caller of page_replace does know it, the only problem is that page_remove_rmap()
automaticly change the cgroup for anonymous pages,
if we want it not to change the cgroup, we can:
increase the cgroup count before page_remove (but in that case what happen if we reach to the limit???)
give parameter to page_remove_rmap() that we dont want the cgroup to be changed.

- annonymous page from KSM is worth to be tracked by memory cgroup ?
(IOW, it's on LRU and can be swapped-out ?)

KSM have no anonymous pages (it share anonymous pages into KsmPAGE -> kernel allocated page without mapping)
so it isnt in LRU and it cannt be swapped, only when KsmPAGEs will be break by do_wp_page() the duplication will be able to swap.


My feeling is that shared pages should be accounted as if they were not shared; that is, a share page should be accounted for each process that shares it. Perhaps sharing within a cgroup should be counted as 1 page for all the ptes pointing to it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/